Sunday, May 31, 2009

LIBERALS ARE KILLING OFF THEIR TAX BASE


The baby shown above will likely begin paying taxes in about 2027, unless aborted.

Friday, May 29, 2009

WHERE IS THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

SO MUCH FOR CHAIRMAN OBAMA'S PREDICTIONS

FROM THE MOTHER BLOG-I'M NOT A WORLD LEADER WHO LIVED THROUGH WWII, BUT I CAN ACT LIKE IT

Thursday, May 28, 2009

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RIGHT OF A PATIENT TO CHOOSE?

"IT IS FINISHED"

“It is finished.” (John 19:30). The abominable actions by Fr. John Jenkins, president of Notre Dame University, who invited President Obama to give the commencement address and receive an honorary Doctor of Laws degree, came to fruition on May 17, 2009 at that formerly Catholic university. This was a travesty and a slap across the face of every faithful Catholic and indeed, every faithful Christian. It was an example of a rogue priest ignoring the directives of his superiors and a testament to the evil that occurs when “Thy Will Be Done” is construed as “my will be done”. Fr. Jenkins defended his invitation as one that would open a dialogue regarding the issue of abortion. Upon what does he hope to base that dialogue?

President Obama supports partial birth abortion and has been a steadfast supporter of Planned Parenthood and abortion on demand. He has vowed to continue to support this position and has appointed vehemently pro-abortion cabinet members, such as Secretary of State Clinton. Yes, Fr. Jenkins, let us dialogue.

Secretary Clinton spoke recently at the Planned Parenthood awards gala in Houston, where she received that organization’s highest honor, The Margaret Sanger Award. Clinton said of Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood: “I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision’, and “I am in awe of her.” Further she said: “It’s the lesson that women’s empowerment is always, always about more than bettering the lives of individual women. It is part of a movement. It’s about economic and political progress for all women and girls”.

The supposedly pro-woman, pro-abortion mentality that Obama and Clinton support has resulted in some 50 million babies’ lives being purposely extinguished. This has resulted in 25 million women denied the right to life, the right to grow and mature, denied the right to vote and to add their voices to those of all women. How can anything be more anti-woman than to deny female babies the right to live? How can anyone be pro-woman when they support the violent termination of the lives of future women for the sake of their own convenience and comfort?

Margaret Sanger, the woman Clinton so admires, was a self professed Nazi sympathizer. She said this when referring to prevention of the birth of Blacks and Jews: "Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race." And, referring to blacks, she said: "Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need ... We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock." Perhaps there is room for dialogue here, Fr. Jenkins.

I do not know whether Fr. Jenkins has reviewed abortion statistics, but they are staggering. We rightly mourn all of our brave soldiers who have died in war and we honor them for their willing and selfless sacrifice. The sum total of all US service related deaths in all wars from the Revolutionary War until today is about 1.2 million. This is about the same number of people as the 1.2 million babies killed each and every year in this country due to abortion. Perhaps Fr. Jenkins could start his dialogue here.

Our country would have had to fight WWII for some 400 years for as many Americans to die as have been killed by abortion. There are as many Americans aborted in one day as have been killed in Iraq in six years. To kill as many Americans as are killed by abortion in just one year the war in Iraq would have to continue for some 1,800 years! Most amazingly, for the same number of US citizens to die in Iraq as have been extinguished by abortion since the Roe vs Wade decision, the war would have to be fought for some 75,000 years! Yes, Fr. Jenkins, let us dialogue with the president.

President Obama continues to promote an ongoing holocaust in affirming the absolute right of a woman or an underage girl to choose. Arguments such as “It’s only a fetus. I don’t have time for a baby. It will be inconvenient. It is not really human”, have been heard in the past. “They are only Jews. They are only Poles or Gypsies. We’re better off without them and they’re less than human”. When we depersonalize the victims and rationalize the action any evil can be made palatable to a supposedly civilized society and the most reprehensible aspects of history are repeated. This holocaust could only continue with the attitudes of people like Fr. Jenkins who wish to dialogue with the perpetrators instead of rebuking them.

Planned Parenthood performs over 200,000 abortions, receives more than $300 million dollars each year from our taxes toward a total budget of nearly $1 billion and a profit of nearly $250 million. To that end, it covers up the physical and sexual abuse of underage females, increased breast cancer rates in post abortive women and severe emotional trauma resulting in significantly increased suicide rates among women who have had abortions. The Royal College in the United Kingdom has warned that women who have had abortions are at increased risk of mental health breakdowns. Far from promoting the cause of women’s health, Planned Parenthood sacrifices women and babies on the altar of its own ideology and for its own profit. How can we dialogue with a president who, by supporting Planned Parenthood, supports the perpetrators of sexual abuse of young girls and is unconcerned that post abortive women commit suicide at more than twice the rate of their peers? How would Fr. Jenkins propose a dialogue with a supporter of these atrocities?

Planned Parenthood operates 80 percent of its clinics in minority neighborhoods. Almost as many African American babies are aborted as are born. A black baby is three times more likely to be killed in the womb as a white baby. Twice as many African Americans have died from abortion as have died from violent crimes, heart disease, accidents and AIDS combined. Every three days more African Americans are killed by abortion than have been killed by the Ku Klux Klan in all its history. Since Roe vs Wade, abortion has reduced the African American population by 25 percent of what it would otherwise have been. Is there any other organization in America that could have so strong a following, receive so much money in tax dollars, be so proudly promoted in our schools and on our streets, yet be as openly and vehemently racist as Planned Parenthood or its supporters? How would Fr. Jenkins propose to dialogue with a president who supports the genocide of his own race?

What are the legacies of Roe v Wade, Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood and the culture of death supported by President Obama? Are we better off ? Are families stronger? Are children emotionally healthier and happier? Has social and economic progress resulted from essentially devouring our own young? The answer is a resounding no! We need social workers, psychiatrists and metal detectors in our schools. In the misguided pursuit of the false god of absolute personal freedom the proponents of the culture of death have insisted in teaching impulse gratification in our schools rather than impulse control and respect for the lives of others. We teach our children that it’s acceptable to deny the right to life of a baby and then wonder how it is possible for a tragedy such as Columbine to occur. If we taught our children that every human life is sacred the killers at Columbine may not have felt it was their right to choose. It is the pinnacle of ignorance for us to expect children to understand that killing a classmate they don’t like is wrong, but killing a baby who may be inconvenient is progressive. This moral sewage is the fertilizer in which Columbine and other incidents like it grew, and continue to grow. It is this morally necrotic ideal that President Obama supports and to which the University of Notre Dame gave a platform.

There is ample evidence that instead of the empowerment of women and promoting equality socially and financially, abortion increases the “feminization of poverty”. The mindset that children are expendable resulted in a significant change of attitude among men. If a woman did bring a child to term, that was her “choice”. Children are the cement that binds families together and in fact are the reason for the existence of families. Once they could be discarded like the weekly trash there was no reason for men to remain associated with women in family units. Between 1969 and 1978 the number of poor households headed by women doubled. Divorce rates have increased markedly over the past 30 years. Poverty rates among women and female children have increased, not decreased, especially for African Americans. There are a greater percentage of women in poverty now, precisely because of the attitudes that promote abortion, than there were before Roe v. Wade. The culture of death proponents simply do not understand that children are the cement of families and families are the necessary foundation of societies. Remove enough of the cement and families, then entire societies, will crumble. Shall we dialogue on this?

I, too, am in awe of Margaret Sanger, but in an entirely different way! Some may not have noticed the real implications of the words Clinton used when she said: “women’s empowerment is always, always about more than bettering the lives of individual women. It is part of a movement.” This is a very revealing and chilling statement and shows the underlying motivation of the culture of death. These words are reminiscent of those used by Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Hitler in promoting the “cause” over the bodies of expendable individuals. Yes, in Clinton’s own words, the culture of death is not really about helping individual women. It is about promoting a social and political agenda that subjugates the individual to the will of those in political power and makes individuals dependent upon those in power. President Obama and Secretary Clinton must be reminded that truth is the greatest enemy of those who promote the culture of death and truth is the greatest ally of those who hold all innocent human life to be sacred. President Obama should have been rebuked by Fr. Jenkins, not invited for a dialogue.

Our new president is the voice of the culture of death. He and Prime Minister Pelosi are in the process of repealing conscience protection for doctors and other health care personnel. The "Freedom of Choice Act" will give a legislative seal to the atrocity that was the Roe vs Wade decision. There will be freedom of choice, but only for those who agree with the culture of death.

Perhaps Fr. Jenkins has forgotten Luke 9:55. “But He turned and rebuked them, and said, "You do not know what kind of spirit you are of.” There would have been no shame had Fr. Jenkins admitted a mistake and corrected it. There would have been no loss of honor in standing firmly as a supporter of human life. There was great shame and dishonor in continuing along a course of prideful disobedience and allying himself and the University of Our Lady with the supporters of the culture of death. By using the excuse of starting a dialogue Fr. Jenkins dishonored the priesthood, his university and the Catholic Bishops. In his act of disobedience, Fr. Jenkins has taught Catholic students to have a selfish disregard for the teaching and authority of the Catholic Church and a lack of regard for the teaching of Christianity.

We who are pro-life have a responsibility to promote the respect of all persons as equal members of society. We embrace people of all races, religions, ages and infirmities. We must promote individual human rights for all. The first among these rights must be the right to life, for without this right, the other rights dependent upon it are meaningless. We must continue to stand for the right of every pre-born person to experience the blessings and joys, as well as the tribulations and difficulties of life. For all of these experiences encompass the nature of life. We must continue to stand firmly against the prevailing culture of convenience and death and condemn it for being anti-woman, anti-family and racist. There is no excuse for weakness or equivocation in this responsibility and there is no excuse for the actions of Fr. Jenkins and the University of Notre Dame. I hope that, for Fr. Jenkins, as far as his tenure at ND, it is finished.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

TODAY'S TOP STORIES

CATHOLIC CONSENSUS:

Fr. Jenkins' welcome to Obama at Notre Dame more sickening than Obama's presence. You be the judge.

Coming in second, so close as to nearly be a photo finish: Judge John Noonan. When did his moral GPS get re-programmed? What was he thinking?

You be the judge? Damn -- HE be the judge.


All in all, a rueful day.


OBAMA RATCHETS UP THE RHETORIC:
NORTH KOREAN NUKE TEST
"SUPER-DUPER UNHELPFUL"

The Nose On Your Face
nails it. And in a similar vein, Andy Borowitz reports that Obama will respond to North Korea with "the strongest possible adjectives -- we will consult a thesaurus". So there.


DENNIS MILLER,
FIRST OUT OF THE CHUTE WITH THE
BON MOT

New SCOTUS nominee:
"Roseanne Bar-Exam"

The New Republic cross-examines the case for Sonya Sotomayor
As Arlo Guthrie once said, just another case of American blind justice.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Swine Flu Not So Bad After All

Monday, May 11, 2009

There is Hope for Liberals

Monday, May 4, 2009

TEN COMMANDMENTS OF OBAMA-Reposting


The New Ten Commandments given by Obama to the people:

1. I am the savior thy president. Thou shalt pay homage to me before any other gods. I will bring you out of the land of recession and deliver thee into iniquity.
2. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image or picture of me, nor of those that associateth with me, nor of those that slithereth in my cabinet, that is unflattering or disrespectful. For I am a jealous savior, visiting the iniquity of the fathers and the liberal press upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me, especially Rush Limbaugh and Shawn Hannity.
3. Thou shalt not speak the name of thy political and economic savior in vain, nor in an unflattering or demeaning way, for I will not hold them guiltless that taketh my name in vain and will pursueth them secretly and publicly in order to silence them.
4. Keepeth the inauguration day of thy lord to sanctify it, as I hath commanded thee. 364 days shalt thou labor and do work, bequeathing all thy money to me. But the 365th thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, nor thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thine ox, nor thine ass, nor any of thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; that thy manservant and thy maidservant may rest as well as thou.
5. Honour thy father and thy mother, or thy father and thy father, or thy mother and thy mother, or thy mother and thy father and thy father etc, as the savior and the my courts hath commanded thee; that thy days may be prolonged, and that it may go well with thee, in the land which the government of the savior and his courts hath given thee.
6. Thou shalt not kill in defense of thyself, nor of thy family, nor of thy neighbor, nor of thy country. Excepteth that thou mayest kill an innocent baby or an ill person or an elderly person in defense of thy schedule or in furtherence of thy convenience, so that thou mayest have more time to work for thy savior.
7. Neither shalt thou commit adultery, excepteth that thou useth contraception to preventeth unwanted consequences or unless thou lyeth with man instead of woman if thou art a man, or with woman instead of man if thou art a woman. This is pleasing to thy lord.
8. Neither shalt thou steal that which belongeth to the savior, nor his cabinet, nor his government, nor preventeth the government of thy lord from attaining all that thy hath. Private property is an abomination unto the lord thy savior Obama.
9. Neither shalt thou bear true witness against thy neighbor, nor against thy presidential savior, nor against his nomineesnor against his cabinet members. For all of thy lord's nominees are held guiltless for the lord's sake.
10. Neither shalt thou refrain from the desire for thy neighbour's wife if thou useth contraception to preventeth unintended consequences thereof; neither shalt thou refrain from coveting thy wealthier neighbour's house, his field, and his manservant, and his maidservant, his ox, and any thing that is thy wealthier neighbour's. Neither shalt thou refrain from coveting thy neighbor's ass, nor the asses of many of thy neighbors, after the manner of thy lord's blessed servant, Barney Frank.

And the people shout: "Amen!"

Saturday, May 2, 2009

"FEMINIST" SHOWS TRUE COLORS

Friday, May 1, 2009

SWINE FLU-HERE WE GO AGAIN

TAXPAYER'S UNION


We have seen the beginning of the revolt of the taxpayer with the tea parties. We now need to take it to the next step. One of my friends has, I believe, the best solution. We should form a taxpayer's union. The only way to prevent the liberals from transforming this country into a socialist republic is to tie the purse strings. We are going to proceed in the direction of formation of this union. Our goal will be ultimately to have tens of millions of members. As those expected to bankroll the new social order, we will conduct a strike. That will consist of the higher earning members and others who can afford to do so taking time off work. Depending on how it works out, this can be a week, a month or even longer. The effect will be to reduce the revenue to the government immediately. We can choose decreased income through ever increasing taxation or by reducing our work load. In continuing the status quo we work harder and keep less of the fruits of our own labor. In the second scenario we work less and deprive Chairman Obama and Prime Minister Pelosi of the means to effect the destruction of our democracy. More to follow soon after some organizational planning.

Monday, April 27, 2009

LIBERALISM IS A MALIGNANT DISORDER

SHE'S ONCE, TWICE, THREE TIMES A LADY

PROF. MARY ANN GLENDON DECLINES MEDAL
AND PARTICIPATION IN NOTRE DAME GRADUATION


Harvard Law School professor, former U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican, former Vatican delegate to world conferences on women, and avid pro-life advocate Mary Ann Glendon has stood athwart history shouting "Stop!"

Well, not shouting so much as just saying "No." I've been waiting for this. She did it without grandstanding. It looks like she contemplated it as possibly an opportunity to be a countervailing voice. But in the end she decided that graduations are not debates, nor are they proving grounds for campaigns of self-justification on the part of wobbly university presidents.

Glendon did not immediately turn down the invitation to receive Notre Dame's Laetare Medal for Catholic witness when she learned that she would be sharing the stage with avidly, RABIDLY pro-abortion-rights President Barack Obama. But two things altered her appraisal of the situation: that the President would be getting an honorary degree, and that Glendon herself had been turned into a couple of the exculpatory "talking points" being madly circulated by ND President Fr. John Jenkins after his invitation to the Infanticide President caused international uproar. Being so nakedly used as a human shield by Fr. Jenkins without so much as a by-y'r-leave obviously helped Glendon wrestle her misgivings to the floor, and she very politely declined to be involved in this distasteful exercise, planned and carried out in flagrant disregard for directives issued by the American Bishops about precisely this type of vehicle for scandal: the provision of a platform and accompanying honors for politicians whose policy positions are in clear opposition to the Church's teachings on the sanctity of life and fundamental justice.

[More on the Laetare Medal here -- as you can see, Notre Dame is a bit promiscuous with its awards. It would have added no great lustre to Mary Ann's trophy case.]

Glendon has written to Fr. Jenkins saying thanks, but no thanks. She has released her letter to the press to make her reasons crystal clear. And she has declined to say another word.

Some women expend their energies in hot pursuit of faux ordinations -- others just LEAD.

Kudos, Professor Glendon, on doin' the right thing.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

MORE ON THAT LIBERAL CANCER THING

Over at the Mother Blog, Winefred had something to say a couple of years ago about the cancer metaphor for liberalism, much as Kindly Doctor Summa has outlined below. It's a worthwhile mental gymnastic, I think, although far too easy to constitute exercise. Ya don't even break a sweat. Here it was:


THE CANCER METAPHOR -- a meditation on National Security voting

I’ve spent the last month and a half dealing with the swift and deadly course of metastasized cancer in a family member, and will keep the details of that experience pretty much to myself. But in retrospect one can’t escape its perennial usefulness as a political metaphor.

Imagine the war on terrorism, with its primary mass lodged in Iraq, as an increasingly lethal cancer on the gasping lungs of the body politic.

Dr. Republican says:
You can try chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or some combination thereof, all of which can be painful and physically devastating to the point where you may consider the cure worse than the disease and may wish for death—but at the end of the day, you could very well extend your life for many healthy years. You could also opt to co-exist with the disease as long as possible, managing it with pain medication and a healthy living regime (and possibly a Mediterranean cruise or two), until such time as you enter into professionally managed palliative care towards a peaceful end.
Dr. Democrat says:
You should never have smoked.

Because you did we’re now going to spend years issuing subpoenas to everyone you ever met, and probing your past until we find out who offered you your first cigarette, whether that person owned shares in a tobacco company, whether the package had a warning label, if you were sold cigarettes as a minor, if the manufacturer had engaged in false advertising or covered up medical research on the negative effects of smoking, if your school provided adequate anti-smoking education, if your mother smoked while driving you to school, and (if you’re female) whether you took up smoking in order to eat less and conform to unrealistic ideals of body image foisted on you by the fashion industry.

Have I left anything
out?

Stop that coughing
—I can’t hear myself think…

Impeach Joe Camel, and have your lungs removed by a date certain
.
Everybody dies. But most of us don’t advocate refusing even to confront a fatal disease. Death may be inevitable—the blood-soaked triumph of a new Muslim caliphate is not. That IS the jihadists’ goal. We should stop at nothing to cure them of that ambition. With Dr. Republican (ideally) you get some course of treatment—with Dr. Democrat you get diagnosis of everything but the cancer.

We achieve a brand of immortality only through our children. Yes, we and they will die-- but let it not be by suicidal distraction, myopia, or indifference. “Not today, O Lord / O not today...”

SWINE FLU ALERT..... Pray.

The internet is all a-zap with reports on the severity of the swine flu outbreak in Mexico, and its emerging hot-spots at points northerly. One of the oft-expressed concerns is that the outbreak went into full flare just days after the return of President Obama from this most recent leg of his Le Ruego Me Disculpe Tour -- especially because Felipe Solis, a noted archaeologist, greeted Mr. Obama at the Museum of Anthropology in Mexico City, and then promptly died of swine flu the next day.

Now, I have made my rapidly increasing disdain for President Obambam/Obumsfeld/Obarometer-of-Doom pretty clear (look deep into the Well) but in response to the possible danger to his health from swine flu, I have but this to say: if you're a prayin' soul, pray now, pray hard, PRAY for the continued health, well-being, and security of the sitting Commander-in-Chief.

That's because, if there are two words in the English language more frightening than "HOPE" and "CHANGE" they are:


"PRESIDENT BIDEN"

Am I right? Hit your knees, America. We CAN get through this crisis.



Today's thinky -- Sound familiar?

THINGS THAT TAKE 100 DAYS TO GESTATE:

1) the beaver (bites off his own testicles to ward off the hunter)

2) the turtle
(pulls his head inside his shell when threatened)

3) the pig
(when bored, engages in "vacuum chewing" of nothing whatsoever)

4) the implosion of two centuries of American culture and institutions

When you turn on CNN and see that the President of the United States has exhibited behaviors 1, 2, and 3, you know that you are mere seconds away from the consummation of #4.

Kaboom.



Or maybe not, according to Rosslyn Smith at American Thinker. So glad I read this.

But we can't lose sight of this: Michael Scheuer, one-time team captain of the CIA hunters of UBL (Bin Laden), writes of The Exalted Obamaramah's "breathtaking display of self-righteousness and intellectual arrogance" as our President spills the beans on the limits of interrogation methods, to satisfy his "desire to install his personal 'moral compass' as the core of U.S. foreign and defense policy."

Let the congregation say, "Amen".

In sooth, I have often been struck by Mr. Scheuer's own breathtaking self-righteousness and arrogance, and I don't buy all his hootings and tootings as wrapped up in his (temporarily) anonymous treatise, Imperial Hubris. Nor do I agree with his jabs at the former Prez in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the above-linked article.

But his every poignard aimed at Obama's hubris and insouciant, if not criminal, negligence in matters of national security is a bullseye. Scheuer is not a clever or entertaining writer like
Mark Steyn, who makes you howl with laughter as his stiletto plunges home. But on this subject, Scheuer is passionate, and reaches a level of fury which, if contagious, is a genuine public service.

As always, hat-tip to the fabulous Gateway Pundit. Read everything.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Sunday, April 12, 2009

PORTLAND TEA PARTY



It was great fun and an eye opening experience. According to the left wing mainstream media the tea parties were attended by a "fringe" of right wing radicals. We saw regular, everyday, ordinary Americans fed up with the progressive march toward socialism and yes, fascism. These were people who understand the reasons why this country was founded and the principles that have sustained it. Signs like the one that said "Legalize the Constitution" and that from a child saying: "Don't rob my piggy bank" showed the understanding by regular people that the constitution is being trampled underfoot by the new order.

Now we hear that the Department of Homeland Security has issued a report on "Right Wing Radicals":

Anti-immigration: “Right wing extremist groups’ frustration over a perceived lack of government action on illegal immigration has the potential to incite individuals or small groups toward violence. If such violence were to occur, it likely would be isolated, small-scale, and directed at specific immigration-related targets.” Recruiting returning vets: “Right wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat.”
Gun-related violence: “Heightened interest in legislation for tighter firearms...may be invigorating right wing extremist activity, specifically the white supremacist and militia movements.”

Yes, quite "Hitler-esque". Everyone with a pro-life bumper sticker or pro-second ammendment views will be suspect. Imagine we right wing extremists asking for law based on the Constitution. How radical!!!

How do you attain fascism?
1. Claim to be "for the common, working people" against the wealthy. Hitler, Mao and Lenin all did that too.
2. Define an enemy. For Hitler, it was the Jews, for Obama and Pelosi it is conservatives and even returning military.
3. Promote laws that decrease the ability of that enemy to function, such as the Nazi laws preventing the rights of the Jews. For Obama it's the "Freedom of Choice Act", "Fairness Doctrine", etc. The names of the laws themselves are designed to hide the real purpose of these fascist documents.
4. Use a crisis to increase government control of industry, financial institutions, etc. Are we not seeing this?
5. Start arresting those in disagreement. Paste the links below into your browser.

http://www.christianadc.org/news-and-articles/280-pastor-jailed-in-for-exercising-pro-life-speech

http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/pro-lifers-charged-again-in-nebraska


Let's be clear. "Right wing" movements opposed to freedom are not conservative or really right wing! They are extreme left wing! The Nazis were not "right wing". They promoted themselves as such against the communists, but they were the National Socialist Party! LEFT WING!!! Mao was not right wing, he was left wing. Lenin was not a right wing extremist, he was a left wing extremist. Fascism comes not from the right but from the left! Wake up America! Restrictions on freedom of speech are not compatible with conservatism. Restrictions on killing innocent human beings are. Let's not confuse the two.

Friday, April 10, 2009